Accountability
Track Record
This page lists every scouting verdict we have published and what happened next. Three rules govern it: a verdict is never edited after publication, wrong calls are never deleted, and every status update is recorded with a date and a source.
If our process works, this page will show it. If it does not, this page will show that too — that is the point of keeping it.
9
Verdicts published
5
European moves documented
4
Still tracking
0
Verdicts not borne out
| Player | Verdict | Verdict date | Outcome | Outcome date | Status | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenshin YasudaDefensive midfielder | MONITOR | July 7, 2026 | V-Varen Nagasaki | — | Tracking | July 25, 2026 |
| Ryunosuke SatoWinger | WATCH | July 8, 2026 | → Valencia CFTransfer | July 8, 2026 | Case study | July 25, 2026 |
| Akito SuzukiStriker | WATCH | July 11, 2026 | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | — | Tracking | July 25, 2026 |
| Tsubasa KasayanagiLeft winger | WATCH | July 12, 2026 | → Patro EisdenLoan | July 10, 2026 | Case study | July 25, 2026 |
| Takato YamamotoDefensive midfielder | WATCH | July 12, 2026 | → Borussia Dortmund U23Loan | July 7, 2026 | Case studySeason-long loan to BVB II (Regionalliga West); no purchase option reported. | July 25, 2026 |
| Zento UnoDefensive midfielder | WATCH | July 13, 2026 | → Borussia MönchengladbachTransfer · ~€500K (reported) | June 18, 2026 | Case study | July 25, 2026 |
| Takuma OminamiCentre-back | MONITOR | July 13, 2026 | V-Varen Nagasaki | — | TrackingReturned from OH Leuven to V-Varen Nagasaki (official 1 July 2026). | July 25, 2026 |
| Naoki KumataCentre-forward | MONITOR | July 15, 2026 | Iwaki FC | — | TrackingDevelopment loan from FC Tokyo. | July 25, 2026 |
| Ryotaro ArakiAttacking midfielder | MONITOR | July 20, 2026 | → Sint-Truidense (STVV)Transfer | July 20, 2026 | Case study | July 25, 2026 |
Methodology
Every scouting report we publish ends in one of two verdicts: WATCH or MONITOR. A verdict is a structured judgment about a player's readiness for a move to a European league, issued at a fixed point in time and never revised afterwards. When circumstances change — a transfer, a loan, an injury, a breakout run — we record the update on this page with a date and a source rather than rewriting the original call. That distinction matters, because a track record only means something if the predictions were frozen before the outcomes arrived.
WATCHThe higher-conviction tier
WATCH means the data profile and the contextual evidence already support a European move within roughly the next two transfer windows. A WATCH player typically combines top-decile output in at least one per-90 metric for his position, sustained starting minutes at senior level, and a contractual or career situation that makes a move plausible. WATCH does not mean a transfer is certain — it means that if a European club moved now, we believe the data would justify the bet.
MONITORThe early-signal tier
MONITOR is the earlier, lower-conviction tier. The underlying signal is real — an extreme strength in one area, an unusual development pathway, an age-relative performance that stands out — but the evidence base is still incomplete: a short sample, a single season, minutes in a lower division, or an unresolved weakness that European football would expose. MONITOR players stay in our database and are re-evaluated as new minutes accumulate. Some graduate to WATCH; some stall. Both outcomes are recorded here.
Case studyThe documentation tier
CASE STUDY covers reports published on or after the move they describe. Our earliest transfer analyses fall into this tier: they were written to explain a deal that had already been announced, not to anticipate it. They remain valuable as market analysis — they are how we build and test the thesis behind the database — but they are not predictions, and we do not count them as such. REALIZED is reserved for the stricter case: the verdict must carry a publication date strictly earlier than the date the move was announced. That single rule is what separates a track record from a scrapbook, and applying it honestly means most of our current entries sit in CASE STUDY rather than REALIZED. We would rather show a small number of genuine calls than a large number of flattering ones.
Not borne outThe missed-call tier
NOT BORNE OUT covers two situations, both recorded rather than hidden. First, a WATCH or MONITOR verdict for which no move materialized before the relevant transfer window closed. Second, a verdict whose underlying statistical case did not hold up in the following season — the metric that justified the call regressed or reversed. We do not delete these entries or move them into TRACKING; a call that did not come true is exactly what a track record exists to show.
What earns a verdict
Verdicts are grounded in the same framework used across this site: raw statistics normalized per 90 minutes, then converted into percentiles against players in the same position. On top of the numbers we weigh context that statistics cannot see — role within the team, pathway (academy background, loan history, national-team involvement), physical profile, and the realistic demands of the destination league. A verdict is only published when both the data case and the contextual case can be written down and defended in a full report.
Data sources
The statistical backbone comes from API-Football (api-football.com), covering appearance data and detailed per-match metrics for roughly 2,000 players across J1, J2 and J3, and from Football LAB (football-lab.jp) for J.League-specific advanced indicators. Transfer facts — fees, dates, contract lengths — are taken from official club announcements first, with reputable primary reporting cited where clubs do not disclose figures. Where a number is unconfirmed, we say so.
Documented moves
Every move we have on record, with the tier it earned. Each entry states what the report said and what happened.
Ryunosuke Sato → Valencia CF
Case studyReport #002 profiled a 19-year-old winger who scored six goals in half a J1 season and was named best player at the U-23 Asian Cup — output at the very top of his age cohort in our database. Valencia signed him that same summer, making him the first Japanese player in the club’s first-team history.
Tsubasa Kasayanagi → Patro Eisden
Case studyReport #004 described the most extreme dribbling profile in our database — 20/20 — attached to a bottom-tier defensive one, and judged the Belgian second tier the right proving ground for that trade-off. He joined Patro Eisden on loan in the Challenger Pro League, the classic first step on the Belgium-to-Europe pathway.
Takato Yamamoto → Borussia Dortmund U23
Case studyAn 18-year-old holding midfielder with five J1 appearances, promoted from Gamba Osaka’s academy and already a training partner for Japan’s senior World Cup squad. Borussia Dortmund took him on a season-long loan into BVB II — a bet on trajectory rather than accumulated output, and the clearest sign yet that European clubs now scout J.League academies directly.
Zento Uno → Borussia Mönchengladbach
Case studyA capped Japan international and Shimizu’s captain at 22, with elite duel and running volume — exactly the screening-midfielder profile we argue the J.League systematically underprices. Borussia Mönchengladbach signed him on a contract to 2030 for a reported €500,000, the cleanest single data point yet for that thesis.
Ryotaro Araki → Sint-Truidense (STVV)
Case studyReport #006 assessed a 24-year-old attacking midfielder with a starkly bimodal J1 record — double-digit goal contributions in 2021 and on loan at FC Tokyo in 2024, close to zero in the seasons between — and issued a MONITOR verdict given that split. Kashima sold him outright to STVV the same day the report published, the club’s second Japanese signing of the window after Nelson Ishiwatari.
Last updated: July 25, 2026
Next scheduled review: September 1, 2026 (after European window close)